Why don't you say that WADA was founded in november 1999? So 4 months after TDF...Explain how wada could have verified Lance's TDF samples? OK that was our disagreement, isn't it? BTW, when did UCI accepted WADA as doping agency control? in 99? 2000? 2001 or 2002?

Lmfao, the only ignorant liar here is you, WADA was founded in 1999 you bullshitter, it even says so on their website (click on 'about WADA'). Ur pathetic desperation to vilify Armstrong with ur selective 'cut & paste' comments smacks of a bitter, resentful european. You don't have a shred of scientific knowlege, ur 'facts' come from articles that you quote repeatedly like a preacher quoting the bible, and when your arguments get debunked, you resort to childish, petulant remarks. LOL @ YOU

LIAR and ignorant.Wrong again about doping list and corticosteroid, and thei doping effect.Lie : WADA is born in 2002. How could they have verified Lance' lies in 1999?Why to use a saddle sore damaging skin before TDF when an injection would have been more appropriate. Usual BS of Lance to mask doping usage. Go to buy a real brain, you got a failed one.

@hghepo Well done for selective copy and pasting "the usage of corticosteroids to increase endurance, mask pain, and stimulate mental / CNS activity is strictly prohibited by sports organizations." The use of corticosteroids IS NOT PROHIBITED FOR ASTHMA,ALLERGIES,SKIN INFECTIONS,TENDINITIS ect, providing the rider declares that he's using it, and it's prescribed by a doctor. Armstrong didn't declare, but he proved the corticosteroid was a cream for saddles sores, and proof was verified by WADA

Come on boy from mesomorphosis website:"they increased gluconeogenesis (liver production of glucose), inhibition of inflammation, increased lipolysis (release of stored fatty acids), catabolism of proteinaceous tissue (i.e. muscle), and psychological symptoms such as euphoria and mania""the usage of corticosteroids to increase endurance, mask pain, and stimulate mental / CNS activity is strictly prohibited by sports organizations."

@hghepo Completely inaccurate I'm afraid, you can even wikipedia corticosteroids and see that their uses are exactly what I said they are, and they are not banned substances, but there are limits on there usage in sport. How corticosteroids relate to PED's are that they can also be given to boost the immune system, and a common side effect of anabolic steroid use is depleted immunity. However, immune boosts are also a widespread treatment for asthma, allergies and post illness recovery.

@Sam1989allen I shall msg you later, as I can't fit an objective response within the YT limit.

What I know by readin "Breaking the Chain" of Willy Voet, is that cyclist uses corticosteroid for doping.If Lance's test were under the limit , he would not have needed a TUE to clear a "non-positive" test.

I think you are the only person that I have said 'you dont know what you are talking about', if I'm wrong with that then I apologise. The reason I haven't mentioned the corticosteroid incident is because I do not know enough about te subject to comment on it, in fact you were the first to mention it. If you are implying that we are all the same person, then you are wrong, just to let you know.Btw, did you type 'ashenden' ad 'nyvelocity' into google? Interested in your thoughts on the link.

@hghepo He was positive for a corticosteroid, which, if you know anything about bio-chemistry, are NOT PED's, they have NO anabolic effect, they are not masking agents, nor are they agonists for PED's. They are the most commonly prescribed drug for distance cyclists, used for asthma, muscle pains, tendinitis, allegies and skin infections such as saddle sores, which is what Armstrong had. Corticosteroids are not banned substances, there are limits on dosage and Armstrong was within the limits.